M.R.
M.R. v. Super. Ct. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
facts and issues pertaining to father.
3 Jurisdiction/Disposition
The social worker filed a jurisdiction/disposition report on December 21, 2012,
and recommended that the court declare the children dependents of the court and provide
mother and father (the parents) with reunification services. Father’s case plan included
the requirements that he participate in counseling, a domestic violence program, a
parenting education program, an outpatient substance abuse program, and substance
abuse testing. The social worker reported that mother and father were married in 2010
but were in the process of getting a divorce. Mother said their history of domestic
violence and father’s incarcerations led to their relationship’s demise. The parents were
living together when A.R. was conceived and born, but not when F.R. was conceived and
born. Father was listed on both children’s birth certificates, and he held both children out
as his own. The social worker thus recommended that father be declared the presumed
father of both children.
On December 27, 2012, the court referred the matter to mediation to resolve the
jurisdiction/disposition issues. The court also continued the matter…