Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. Robert T. Greene

Good Law
373 F.2d 526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 196721166_1California285 words

Opinion

Opinion

While operating a gasoline motor driven “go-cart,” appellee’s son struck and injured a third person. Appellant denies coverage under its Homeowners’ Policy because of a clause excluding operation of midget automobiles “while away from the premises or the ways immediately adjoining * * *."

The accident occurred at a point fifty feet north of the northern boundary of appellee’s property on a private driveway which ran parallel to appellee’s western boundary. The district court held that the accident nonetheless occurred on “ways immediately adjoining” appellee’s premises. Appellant contends that this was error in view of the interpretation given the quoted phrase in United States v. Great American Indem. Co., 214 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1954).

But the present case is controlled by California law. The Supreme Court of California held in Pacific Employees Ins. Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 54 Cal.Rptr. 385 , 419 P.2d 641 (1966), that the phrase “ways immediately adjoining” in a policy such as the present one contemplates coverage .of use of an automobile on the public roads and highways which immediately adjoin the policyowner’s private premises; that such a policy is therefore subject to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.