Erik Knutson v. Sirius Xm Radio Inc.

Good Law
771 F.3d 559·2014 WL 5802284·61 Communications Reg. (P&F) 706·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 201412-56120California4,311 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Plaintiff Erik Knutson (“Knutson”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his putative class action and granting Defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc.’s (“Sirius XM”) motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Knutson alleges that he did not consent to enter into a binding Customer Agreement with Sirius XM, and that the Customer Agreement as a whole, and the arbitration provision specifically, are unconscionable.

In November 20Í1, Knutson purchased a vehicle from Toyota that included a 90-day trial subscription to Sirius XM satellite radio. About a month after his trial subscription was activated, Knutson received a ‘Welcome Kit” from Sirius XM that contained a Customer Agreement. Knutson alleges that during his trial subscription, he received three unauthorized calls from Sirius XM on his cellphone. In response to these calls Knutson, in February 2012, brought a class action suit against Sirius XM alleging violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The district court found that both parties consented to enter into the Customer Agreement and that the arbitration clause was valid and enforceable under the FAA.

Knutson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.