Pena

Pena v. Navarro CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2014B254023California4,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/10/14 Pena v. Navarro CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

RICHARD PENA et al., B254023

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC491269) v.

RAFAEL NAVARRO et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Deidre H. Hill, Judge. Affirmed. Einstein & Spiegel and Gary R. Einstein, for Plaintiffs and Appellants, Richard Pena and Natalia Pena. Law Offices of Andrew Ritholz and Andrew Ritholz, for Defendants and Respondents, Rafael Navarro and Florina Navarro. ___________________ Richard Pena and Natalia Pena appeal from the dismissal of their lawsuit against Rafael Navarro and Florina Navarro following the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.