Patkins

Patkins v. Brown CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2014C073964California1,621 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/12/14 Patkins v. Brown CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

DAVID C. PATKINS, C073964

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 06CS01729)

v.

DENISE D. BROWN, as Director, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

Petitioner David C. Patkins appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandate, contending respondent Denise D. Brown, Director of the Medical Board of California, (the Board) has a ministerial duty to “ ‘process,’ ” i.e., to “ ‘address, investigate, and give disposition’ ” to, his consumer complaint filed with the Board against Rebecca Piantini, M.D., for testimony she provided in Patkins’s criminal proceeding related to the death of his infant son. The Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.