Siegfried

Siegfried v. Pacific Specialty Ins. CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2014B250192California8,473 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/13/14 Siegfried v. Pacific Specialty Ins. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ELAINE SIEGFRIED, B250192

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC477969) v.

PACIFIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rolf M. Treu, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. Losh & Khoshlesan and Stephen M. Losh for Plaintiff and Appellant. Shoecraft and Burton, Devin T. Shoecraft and Michelle L. Burton for Defendant and Respondent Pacific Specialty Insurance Company. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Michael B. Magloff and Brian Slome for Defendant and Respondent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.