Ramos

Ramos v. Frey's Electronics CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2014B246404California9,958 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Filed 11/17/14 Ramos v. Frey’s Electronics CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

LEO RAMOS, B246404

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC486879) v.

FRY’S ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anthony J. Mohr, Judge. Reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings. Matthew & George, Abraham Matthew, Jacob George and Mazyar Mazarei, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Richard J. Simmons and Matthew M. Sonne, for Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________ Leo Ramos brought a class action complaint against his employer, Fry’s Electronics, for unpaid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.