Prado
Prado v. County of Riverside CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2014E058796California2,524 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 11/17/14 Prado v. County of Riverside CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THOMAS PRADO,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E058796
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC473510)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al. OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John W. Vineyard, Mac
R. Fisher, and Daniel A. Ottolia, Judges.1 Affirmed.
Aviles & Associates and Moises A. Aviles for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Kinkle, Rodiger and Spriggs, Bruce E. Disenhouse, and Janine L. Highiet-Ivicevic
for Defendants and Respondents.
1 Judge Vineyard sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. Judge Fisher ordered the entire action…