Lozano
Lozano v. Harles CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 11/17/14 Lozano v. Harles CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DONALD LOZANO et al.,
F067638
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 648437) v. JAKE HARLESS et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Timothy W. Salter, Judge. Law Offices of Mark S. Nelson, Mark S. Nelson and Angelica Anguiano for Plaintiffs and Appellants. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Todd W. Baxter and Dana B. Denno for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiffs sued their insurer and their insurance agent for negligence in failing to advise them of the availability of higher limits on their uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, and failing to increase…