Lozano

Lozano v. Harles CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2014F067638California5,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/17/14 Lozano v. Harles CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DONALD LOZANO et al.,

F067638

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 648437) v. JAKE HARLESS et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Timothy W. Salter, Judge. Law Offices of Mark S. Nelson, Mark S. Nelson and Angelica Anguiano for Plaintiffs and Appellants. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, Todd W. Baxter and Dana B. Denno for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiffs sued their insurer and their insurance agent for negligence in failing to advise them of the availability of higher limits on their uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, and failing to increase…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.