Wilson

facts of the case, referring to such concepts as “the well” and “lot 11” with no

explanation. It does state a handful of facts, albeit belatedly, and it does cite them to the

record; however, these facts are cherry-picked and out of context.

2 In light of the 18 years of litigation between the parties, this is a masterpiece of understatement.

3 “An appellant must fairly set forth all the significant facts, not just those beneficial

to the appellant. [Citation.]” (In re S.C. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 396, 402.) “An

appealed judgment is presumed correct, and the appellant must affirmatively demonstrate

error. [Citation.] An appellant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the

judgment must cite the evidence in the record supporting the judgment and explain why

such evidence is insufficient as a matter of law. [Citations.] An appellant who fails to

cite and discuss the evidence supporting the judgment cannot demonstrate that such

evidence is insufficient. The fact that there was substantial evidence in the record to

support a contrary finding does not compel the conclusion that there was no substantial

evidence to support the judgment. An appellant . . . who…