Elliott

Elliott v. Geico Indemnity Co.

Good Law
180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 331·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1050·231 Cal. App. 4th 789
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 2014C072129California5,732 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Christina Elliott appeals from a judgment dismissing her lawsuit against Geico Indemnity Company (Geico), which was entered after the trial court granted Geico’s motion for summary judgment. Elliott’s husband was killed when his motorcycle was struck by a truck driven by a drunk driver, Lesa Shaffer, who was returning home from her job at Peterson’s Comer, a restaurant and bar in Nevada City. The trial court concluded Geico was not required to pay underinsured motorist benefits under a motorcycle insurance policy issued to Elliott and her husband (Geico policy) because Elliott recovered more than the $100,000 underinsured motorist coverage limits in settlement of a wrongful death action brought against Shaffer and the owners of the restaurant (Shaffer’s insurer paid $15,000 and the owners’ general liability insurer paid $250,000).

We agree and affirm. As we explain, the Geico policy unambiguously allows Geico to deduct from the underinsured motorist coverage limits “the amount paid to the insured by or for any person or organization that may be held legally liable for the injury.” In addition to the $15,000 paid to Elliott for Shaffer’s liability, $250,000 was paid by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.