Hammontree

Hammontree v. Segal CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 2014D064477California3,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/19/14 Hammontree v. Segal CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEVIN WESLEY JONES-HAMMONTREE, D064477

a Minor, etc.,

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00100381- v. CU-MM-CTL)

DMITRI SEGAL,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Judith F.

Hayes, Judge. Affirmed.

Mark B. Simowitz for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Schmid & Voiles, Denise H. Greer, Kyle A. Cruse and Robert B. Fessinger for

Defendant and Respondent.

In establishing his medical malpractice claim, plaintiff and appellant Devin

Wesley Jones-Hammontree (Devin) had the burden of showing that, in treating him,

defendant and respondent Dr. Dmitri Segal, a radiologist,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.