Gitlin

Gitlin v. Howard CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2014A138033California8,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 11/20/14 Gitlin v. Howard CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ROBERT GITLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A138033

v. (Mendocino County LEE HOWARD, Super. Ct. No. SCUKCVG1159160) Defendant and Respondent.

ROBERT GITLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A138034 v. JACK COX et al., (Mendocino County Defendants and Respondents. Super. Ct. No. SCUKCVG1159160)

In 2006, plaintiffs purchased an undeveloped commercial property in Ukiah. Unable to sell the property in 2010 when a prospective buyer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.