Platero

Platero v. Anchor Hocking CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2014B250947California3,901 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/20/14 Platero v. Anchor Hocking CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ISMENIA PLATERO et al., B250947

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC445557) v.

ANCHOR HOCKING et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert L. Hess, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Martin L. Stanley, Martin L. Stanley and Jeffrey R. Lamb for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Frost Brown Todd, Beth S. Naylor, Holland & Knight, Shelley Hurwitz, Acker & Whipple, Stephen Acker, Leslie Anne Burnet, Kelley E. Harman, for Defendants and Respondents. The claims of appellants Ismenia Platero and Ronald Marroquin (together, “plaintiffs”) arise from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.