United States v. L. Mabel Evans

Good Law
375 F.2d 730·19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1135·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6954
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 196721128California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Taxpayer-appellee Evans is a resident in Terwilliger Plaza, an apartment complex in Portland, Oregon. She properly filed her 1962 tax return and paid the tax due of $47.66. Maintaining that Terwilliger Plaza was a cooperative housing corporation within section 216(b) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code ( 26 U.S.C. § 216 (b) (1)), she filed a claim for refund based on deductions for her proportionate share of the corporation’s interest and taxes. The claim for refund was disallowed, and she brought suit for a refund in the district court, jurisdiction being under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 . Taxpayer Evans prevailed, and the government has appealed to our court, jurisdiction here being under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

The sole question on this appeal is whether the taxpayer was a “tenant-stockholder” of a “cooperative housing corporation” within the meaning of section 216.

Terwilliger Plaza, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation organized under the law of Oregon. It does not issue stock, but is composed of members. Each member pays an original membership fee and a periodic “maintenance fee.” In return, each member gets a life interest in a designated apartment, and participates in management by voting for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.