United States v. Scott Parent

Good Law
585 F. App'x 668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 201413-30349California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Scott Parent appeals his conviction for violating the Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a)(l)(2)(B), (3). He also challenges his classification as a Tier III sex offender for the purposes of sentencing, and the denial of a motion to certify a question to' the Oregon Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm.

1. We have previously rejected Parent’s argument that SORNA’s delegation of authority to the Attorney General violates the separation of powers doctrine. United States v. Richardson, 754 F.3d 1143, 1145-46 (9th Cir.2014); United States v. Elkins, 683 F.3d 1039, 1045 (9th Cir.2012).

2. The district court properly determined that Parent’s conviction for attempted rape in the first degree under Oregon Revised Statutes §§ 163.375, 161.405, is “comparable to” attempted sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. § 2242 , a Tier III offense under 42 U.S.C. § 16911 and the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2A3.5. See United States v. Cabrerar-Gutierrez, 756 F.3d 1125, 1133 (9th Cir.2014) (requiring use of the categorical approach described in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 , 109…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.