Harminder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
586 F. App'x 269
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 201413-70419California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Harminder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on Singh’s initial denial of any fear of persecution or torture if returned to India and his changing explanations for this denial, and based on the issues the agency noted regarding the letter from the leader of the Shiromani Akali Dal Mann. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the totality of circumstances); see also Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir.2004) (denial of mistreatment during airport interview supported adverse credibility determination). We reject…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.