People v. Steigman CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2014D065955California160 words

Opinion

Huffman, J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In his guilty plea Stiegman admitted assaulting three separate people with force

likely to cause great bodily injury. He also admitted that he personally inflicted great

bodily injury on each of the victims.

DISCUSSION

As we have previously noted, appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to

Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738

2 (Anders), counsel has identified possible but not reasonably arguable issues for reversal

to aid the court in its review of the record:

1. Whether Stiegman was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement?

2. Whether Stiegman was given all custody and conduct credits to which he was

entitled?

We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738. We have been unable to find any reasonably

arguable issue for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Stiegman on

this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.

3