Colonial Pacific Leasing v. Kazi CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2014B248862California4,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 11/24/14 Colonial Pacific Leasing v. Kazi CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING B248862

CORPORATION et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BC448587)

v.

KHATIJA KAZI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michelle R. Rosenblatt, Judge. Affirmed. Gareeb Law Group, Alexander S. Gareeb, Fadi K. Rasheed; and Richard A. Kraslow for Defendant and Appellant. Reed Smith, Farah Tabibkhoei and Alexander Terras for Plaintiffs and Respondents. —————————— Defendant Khatija Kazi appeals summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Colonial Pacific Leasing Corporation, GE Capital Commercial, Inc., and General…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.