Oiye

Oiye v. Fox CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2014H038410California8,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Defendant James Daniel Fox appeals from a judgment entered after a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Lauren Oiye on claims relating to defendant’s many years of sexual abuse of plaintiff. On appeal, defendant challenges some of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, the adjudication of the fraudulent transfer claim, and the orders on the costs and attorney fees. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was friends with defendant’s daughter, when the girls were teenagers. The girls had met through a swim program, and plaintiff spent a lot of time with defendant and his family. One day in 2001, when plaintiff was 13 years old, she was at defendant’s home when he started kissing her neck. He then carried her to his daughter’s bed and touched her in a sexual manner. Defendant was in his early 40’s at the time. Defendant’s sexual advances continued from that day forth. Plaintiff estimated that when she was in the eighth grade, she had sex with defendant a few times a week. When plaintiff was in high school, she had sex with defendant almost every day. During these years, defendant told plaintiff that he loved her,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.