Amkor Technology v. Tessera CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2014A139596California3,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/25/14 Amkor Technology v. Tessera CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Petitioner and Appellant,

A139596

v. TESSERA, INC., (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CPF-13-512796) Respondent.

Petitioner Amkor Technology, Inc. (Amkor) appeals from an order denying its petition to correct an arbitration award that it contends exceeds the arbitrators’ authority. We conclude that the trial court correctly held that the petition was untimely and, in all events, lacks merit. Factual and Procedural History On May 9, 1996, Tessera, Inc. (Tessera) and Amkor entered a license agreement with respect to certain patents held by Tessera. In 2006, Tessera initiated arbitration proceedings alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.