Smith v. Ricca CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2014H039253California13,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Filed 11/25/14 Smith v. Ricca CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DELMAN SMITH, et al., H039253 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. 112CV228357)

v.

MARIA RICCA, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

These appeals challenge the denial of two special motions to strike a complaint filed in the third of a series of related cases. In the first case, respondent Delman Smith, an attorney, represented appellant Maria Ricca in a marital dissolution proceeding that included a dispute about spousal support (dissolution case). Respondent Denise Newsom was a paralegal in Smith’s office who assisted Smith by preparing forms submitted to the court. Some time after Smith withdrew as counsel, the court found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.