Qi Cao v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
585 F. App'x 695
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 201412-73129California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Qi Cao, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2011). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The agency denied Cao’s claims based an adverse credibility determination. The agency’s implausibility finding regarding Cao’s employment verification letter is based on speculation and conjecture. See Jibril v. Gonzales, 428 F.3d 1129, 1136 (9th Cir.2005) (rejecting adverse credibility finding where IJ’s conclusions rested on “speculation and conjecture”). Further, the agency mischaracterized the evidence in finding that Cao admitted she told her mother and boyfriend what to write in their letters, and in finding the letters were similar. See Tekle v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 1044,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.