Valentine
Valentine v. GEP Cencast CA2/5
Opinion
Opinion
Kriegler, J.
Filed 11/25/14 Valentine v. GEP Cencast CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
MAX VALENTINE, B251737
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC488251) v.
GEP CENCAST, LLC, dba CENTRAL
CASTING,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Nevin Kamath and Nevin Kamath for Plaintiff and Appellant. Fisher & Phillips, John M. Polson, Steven A. Witt, for Defendant and Respondent. ________________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Max Valentine appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendant and respondent GEP…