Versailles HOA v. Haraszti CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2014G049262California4,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 11/26/14 Versailles HOA v. Haraszti CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE VERSAILLES HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION,

G049262

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00598458) v.

OPINION

TEGZE HARASZTI,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, David T. McEachen, Judge. Affirmed. Tegze Haraszti, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Tinnelly Law Group and Bruce R. Kermott for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * Tegze Haraszti appeals the trial court’s attorney fee award in favor of the Versailles Homeowners Association (the association or HOA) after it prevailed in its lawsuit against Haraszti by securing a permanent injunction to prevent him from interfering with the HOA’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.