People v. Crummer CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2014A141712California756 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

BACKGROUND

Appellant was convicted by a jury of felony assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) and second degree robbery (§§ 211; 212.5, subd. (c)). The jury found true

1 Appellant denominated his filing in the trial court a motion for resentencing, but in accordance with the statutory language of section 1170.126, we will refer to it, as did the trial court in its written decision, as a petition for resentencing. 2 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 allegations that appellant personally inflicted great bodily injury and personally used a deadly weapon (§§ 12022.7, subd. (a); 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The jury also found true the allegations that appellant had suffered two prior serious felony strike convictions within the meaning of section 667, subdivisions (b)-(i) and section 1170.12, and three prior prison convictions within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). (People v. Sandefur (Nov. 19, 2007, A110850) [nonpub. opn.], *1, *3.)3 A second jury found true additional allegations filed in an amended information that two of appellant’s prior felony convictions, both of which had previously been alleged as strikes, also constituted prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.