United States v. Jose Riveros

Good Law
585 F. App'x 750
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 201414-50106California258 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Alberto Hernandez Riveros appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez Riveros’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Hernandez Riveros the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Hernandez Riveros waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal his sentence, with the exception of the court’s calculation of his criminal history category. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Hernandez Riveros’s plea or the criminal history category calculated by the court. We therefore affirm as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.