Orcutt

Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2014E061844California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/2/14 Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DANA LEE ORCUTT,

Petitioner, E061844

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1309053)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION

RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

Respondent;

ALEXANDER PINTO,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate/prohibition. Sunshine

S. Sykes, Judge. Petition granted in part and denied in part.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, John S. Lowenthal, Mathew L. Walker;

Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robert A. Olson, Cynthia E. Tobisman, and David E.

Hackett, for Petitioner.

1 No appearance for Respondent.

No appearance for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.