Orcutt
Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2014E061844California390 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 12/2/14 Orcutt v. Super. Ct. CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
DANA LEE ORCUTT,
Petitioner, E061844
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1309053)
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION
RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
Respondent;
ALEXANDER PINTO,
Real Party in Interest.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate/prohibition. Sunshine
S. Sykes, Judge. Petition granted in part and denied in part.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, John S. Lowenthal, Mathew L. Walker;
Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robert A. Olson, Cynthia E. Tobisman, and David E.
Hackett, for Petitioner.
1 No appearance for Respondent.