Martinez

Martinez v. Joe's Crab Shack Holdings

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2014B242807MCalifornia9,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/3/14 Unmodified version attached

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ROBERTO MARTINEZ et al., B242807

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC377269) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

JOE’S CRAB SHACK HOLDINGS et al., AND DENYING REHEARING (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT) Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 10, 2014 be modified as follows: On page 6, footnote 8, delete the words “that inadequately explained the claims” so that the footnote reads: According to CAI, more than 90 putative class members have settled potential claims with CAI and Landry’s directly although the record includes only 10 of these settlement agreements. CAI obtained these releases by reading a prepared script to managerial employees and offering a $500 payment for each year employed as a manager (or approximately $10 per week). Three other employees, including Kevin Austin, a former general manager who provided a declaration on behalf of CAI in this litigation in 2008,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.