Bernard Przybylski, Jr. v. Federal National Mortgage Asso

MEMORANDUM

Bernard John Przybylski, Jr., appeals pró se from the district court’s judgment in his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir.2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Przybylski’s action because Przybylski failed to allege facts sufficient to state a cognizable claim for relief. See Hogan v. Wash. Mut. Bank, N.A., 230 Ariz. 584 , 277 P.3d 781, 782 (2012) (en banc) (“Arizona’s non-judicial foreclosure statutes do not require the beneficiary to prove its authority or ‘show the note’ before the trustee may commence a non-judicial foreclosure.”); Farrell v. West, 57 Ariz. 490 , 114 P.2d 910, 911 (1941) (where “it appears there is an unsatisfied balance due to a defendant-mortgagee, ..., the court will not quiet the title until and unless [the plaintiff] pays off such mortgage lien”); Strawberry Water Co. v. Paulsen, 220 Ariz. 401 , 207 P.3d 654, 659 (Ariz.Ct.App.2008) (real property interests cannot be converted).

Contrary to Przybylski’s contentions, the district court…