Rosado

Rosado v. Hendricks CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 2014B252484California2,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 12/4/14 Rosado v. Hendricks CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

MICHAEL ROSADO, B252484

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MC024189) v.

PIERRE STEPHANE HENDRICKS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Randolph Rogers, Judge. Affirmed. Michael Rosado, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Herzfeld & Rubin, Vadim Braslavsky, for Defendant and Respondent Pierre Stephane Hendricks, M.D. Prindle, Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes & Reinholtz, Jack R. Reinholtz and Cynthia A. Palin, for Defendant and Respondent Steven N. Brourman, M.D. Plaintiff Michael Rosado, appearing in propia persona, filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.