Pinkins
Pinkins v. Stempinski CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant Tonya Pinkins brought suit alleging various causes of
action against defendants and respondents Meridith Stempinski, Pam Stearns, Virginia
Pharris, Christina Amezola, Debbie Gunter, Emily Bares, Lisa Beauregard, Ana Grimes,
and Centennial High School Theatre Boosters, relating to purported defamatory
statements. In an unpublished opinion filed August 21, 2012, we reversed the trial
court’s grant of defendants’ special motion to strike plaintiff’s complaint (anti-SLAPP
motion) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute).
Plaintiff now appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining defendants’ demurrers to
plaintiff’s first amended complaint without leave to amend and awarding defendants
costs. We find no error and affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In our previous opinion in this case, we summarized the relevant factual
background as follows:
“Defendant Centennial High School Theatre Boosters (Booster Club) was
organized in 2008 to support the Centennial High School Theatre Arts Department.
Centennial High School is a public school within the Corona-Norco Unified School