Hale
Hale v. Sharp Healthcare
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
This is Dagmar Hale's second appeal in a class action against Sharp Healthcare and
Sharp Grossmont Hospital (together Sharp) contending Sharp unfairly charged her and
other uninsured patients more for emergency services than the fees it accepted from
patients covered by private insurance or governmental plans. In the first appeal, we
partially reversed a judgment of dismissal following a demurrer. The trial court thereafter
certified the class. After engaging in discovery, Sharp moved to decertify the class arguing
a class action is inappropriate based on lack of ascertainability and lack of predominantly
common issues. The trial court considered the evidence presented and found there is no
reasonable means to ascertain the members of class without individual inquiries of more
than 120,000 patient records and continued class treatment is not appropriate because
individualized issues, rather than common issues, predominate, particularly with respect to
whether or not class members are entitled to recover damages. Finding no abuse of
discretion, we affirm the order decertifying the class.