Swartz

Swartz v. Smith CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2014D064324California2,400 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Filed 12/5/14 Swartz v. Smith CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN F. SWARTZ et al., D064324

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2009-00052744-

CU-BC-NC)

TYE A. SMITH et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert P.

Dahlquist, Judge. Affirmed.

Kevin F. Swartz and Diane E. Kocheran, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

This action arises out of alleged construction defects in a residence Kevin F.

Swartz and Diane E. Kocheran (together, plaintiffs) bought from defendants Tye A.

Smith and Lori Smith (together, the Smiths), located in Vista, California. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.