Shalant

Shalant v. Mackston CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 8, 2014B250208California3,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 12/8/14 Shalant v. Mackston CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JOSEPH L. SHALANT et al., B250208

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC116968) v.

ROBERT MACKSTON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Allan J. Goodman, Judge. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

Joseph L. Shalant and Wendy Kronick, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Doherty & Catlow and John Doherty for Defendant and Respondent Robert Mackston.

Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, Mark Schaeffer and Michael W. Feenberg for Defendants and Respondents Thomas J. Feeley and Thomas M. Dempsey.

********** The main issue presented is whether the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.