People v. Haynes CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 8, 2014F067601California601 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/8/14 P. v. Haynes CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F067601

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 1459675) v.

NORMAN JACK HAYNES, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Marie S. Silveira, Judge. J. Edward Jones, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Kane, J. and Cornell, J.

PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Appellant Norman Jack Haynes was charged in a criminal complaint filed on May 30, 2013, with two counts of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 21310).1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.