People v. Tisdale CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2014H040035California8,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Filed 12/9/14 P. v. Tisdale CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H040035

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F23664)

v.

COLIN SEAN TISDALE,

Defendant and Appellant.

In this appeal, Colin Sean Tisdale (appellant) contends that his conviction for transporting methadone should be reversed because the prosecution for that offense was barred by the two dismissal rule of Penal Code section 1387. Alternatively, appellant contends that the entire judgment must be reversed because it was based on the admission of a statement obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). Procedure Below On September 4, 2012, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.