Marriage of Portener CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2014E057562California6,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/9/14 Marriage of Portener CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re the Marriage of Susan and David Portener.

SUSAN E. PORTENER,

E057562

Appellant, (Super.Ct.No. IND100454) v.

OPINION

DAVID B. PORTENER,

Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. Michael McCoy and

Gregory J. Olson, Temporary Judges. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art VI, §21.) Affirmed.

Sheila A. Williams and Laura J. Fuller, for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

1 On May 25, 2010, appellant Susan E. Portener (Susan) filed a petition for

dissolution of marriage to respondent David B. Portener (David). Susan and David had

one adult child. Susan sought spousal support, attorney fees, and the determination of

rights to the community property.

A court trial was held on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.