People v. Paez CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2014D066376California7,151 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Filed 12/11/14 P. v. Paez CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. :

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D066376

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SWF1201409)

MICHAEL ANGEL PAEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Michael J.

Rushton, Judge. Affirmed.

Steven J. Carroll, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General,

William M. Wood, Meagan J. Beale and Amanda E. Casillas, Deputy Attorneys General,

for Plaintiff and Respondent.

The Riverside County District Attorney's Office filed an information charging

Michael Angel Paez with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.