Silkes
Silkes v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA2/8
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 12/11/14 Silkes v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
ALAN SILKES, B252857
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC067741) v.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ramona G. See, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Jenifer J. Anisman, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Albertson Law and Gina L. Albertson, for Defendants and Respondents.
_________________________________ Plaintiff Alan Silkes appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against defendants Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (Select Portfolio), Wells Fargo…