Silkes

Silkes v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2014B252857California8,582 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/11/14 Silkes v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ALAN SILKES, B252857

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC067741) v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ramona G. See, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Jenifer J. Anisman, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Albertson Law and Gina L. Albertson, for Defendants and Respondents.

_________________________________ Plaintiff Alan Silkes appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against defendants Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (Select Portfolio), Wells Fargo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.