Sanders v. Erreca

Good Law
377 F.2d 960
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 196721153_1California2,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

377 F.2d 960 Louis SANDERS, Fay Sanders, Harry Groode and Ruth Groode, Appellants, v. John ERRECA, Robert B. Bradford, James A. Guthrie, Joseph C. Houghteling,Roger S. Woolley, William S. Whitehurst, Abraham Kofman, Franklin S. Payne,Pierson L. Pedley, Appellees. No. 21153. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 25, 1967, Rehearing Denied July 28, 1967. Gideon Kanner, Fadem & Kanner, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Harry S. Fenton, Chief Counsel, R. B. Pegram, Deputy Chief Counsel, Joseph A. Montoya, Richard L. Franck, Anthony J. Ruffolo, Ronald L. Johnson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before BARNES, JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants (plaintiffs in the District Court) appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing without leave to amend their amended complaint and action wherein they seek to recover from appellees (defendants in the District Court) damages under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 1983). 2 The original complaint was filed on January 10, 1966, and an amended complaint was filed on February 15, 1966. 3 The dismissal of the action on March 14, 1966, with prejudice, following a hearing on appellees'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.