Keck

Pacific Corporate Group Holdings v. Keck

Bad Law
181 Cal. Rptr. 3d 399·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1130·232 Cal. App. 4th 294
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2014D062277California10,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Pacific Corporate Group Holdings, LLC (PCGH), brought this action against its former employee, Thomas Keck, seeking to collect on a promissory note. Keck defended against the action by claiming that any money that he owed PCGH was offset by monies that PCGH owed him. Keck also filed a cross-complaint against PCGH seeking damages for unpaid bonus and severance payments that he claimed were due him pursuant to two employment agreements. In a special verdict, the jury found that PCGH owed Keck $270,547.95 under the terms of a 2006 employment agreement (2006 Agreement). PCGH filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or for new trial on the ground that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding that the parties entered into the 2006 Agreement. The trial court denied PCGH’s motion. Keck filed a motion for additur, or in the alternative, for a new trial on damages, on the ground that the jury had awarded inadequate damages in light of the bonus and severance provisions in the 2006 Agreement. The trial court granted Keck’s motion, and issued an additur and conditional order granting a new trial on damages. PCGH refused…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.