United States v. Amadeo Medina

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 201414-50023California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 12 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50023

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00037-WQH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMADEO MEDINA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2014**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Amadeo Medina appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his jury-trial conviction and 94-month sentence for attempted entry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Medina contends that his conviction and sentence violate the Sixth

Amendment because the fact of the prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.