Domingo Alas-Recinos v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
587 F. App'x 427
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 201410-71026California222 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Domingo Antonio Alas-Recinos, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Rahimzadeh v. Holder, 613 F.3d 916, 920 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Alas-Recinos testified he was the victim of two robberies, which he did not report to police. The record does not compel the conclusion that the government of El Salvador was or would be unable or unwilling to protect Alas-Recinos. See id. at 920-23 (discussing various means by which a petitioner may fill the “gap in proof’ left by the absence of a report to the police). Thus, his asylum claim fails.

Because Alas-Recinos failed to establish eligibility for asylum, his withholding of removal claim necessarily fails. See id. at 923 .

Finally, Alas-Recinos does not challenge the agency’s denial of CAT relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.