Daniel Penate Salguero v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
587 F. App'x 436
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 201409-73012California426 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Miguel Baires, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Baires does not claim past persecution. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Baires failed to establish a fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. See Bolshakov v. INS, 133 F.3d 1279, 1280-81 (9th Cir.1998) (criminal acts bore no nexus to a protected ground); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir.2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). We reject Baires’s contentions that the IJ failed to appropriately consider his evidence and claim. We also reject Baires’s contention that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.