Miller v. Verizon Wireless CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2014D063970California7,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 12/12/14 Miller v. Verizon Wireless CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY P. MILLER, D063970

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00092363-

CU-BC-CTL)

VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment and postjudgment orders of the Superior Court of San

Diego County, John S. Meyer, Judge. Affirmed.

Franklin & Franklin and J. David Franklin; Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno

and Anthony A. Ferrigno for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Katten Muchin Rosenman, Ryan J. Larson, Jarin R. Jackson and Alan D. Croll for

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff and appellant Jerry P. Miller doing business as Imagineering Cellular and

Imagineering Wireless…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.