In re A.Z. CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2014H040414California3,819 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Facts and Proceedings Below On January 4, 2011, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a)1 (Petition A) in which the district attorney alleged that A.Z. committed first degree burglary of an inhabited residence (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460, subd. (a), 667.5, subd. (c)(21)). On

1 All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. March 22, 2011, A.Z. admitted the charge. The juvenile court found A.Z. eligible and suitable for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ). Subsequently, A.Z. failed DEJ due to his “non-compliance.” The juvenile court sustained Petition A and placed A.Z. in the community release program (CRP). At the disposition hearing held on November 28, 2011, the juvenile court declared A.Z. a ward of the court, placed him on the electronic monitoring program (EMP) for 60 days, and placed him on probation in his parents’ home. On January 20, 2012, the probation officer filed a petition pursuant to section 777 (Petition B) in which he alleged that A.Z. had violated his probation by failing to abide by the terms of the EMP contract, by failing to abide by his parents’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.