In J.M. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2014B254185California1,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

The juvenile court sustained a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition against defendant and appellant J.M. (J.M.) finding true the allegation that defendant had committed misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter. On appeal, J.M.’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) requesting that this court independently review the entire record to determine if there are any issues, which if resolved in J.M.s favor, would require reversal or modification of the adjudication and disposition orders. Accordingly, we notified J.M. that he could brief any grounds of appeal, contentions, or arguments he wanted us to consider. J.M. did not file a supplemental brief. Based on our independent review of the entire file, we conclude that there are no arguable issues on appeal. We therefore affirm the adjudication and disposition orders from which J.M. appeals.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Prosecution’s Case On October 5, 2011, at approximately 8:15 a.m., Denise Rorty was stopped in her car at a stop light at the intersection of Palos Verdes Drive North and Hawthorne Boulevard. According to Rorty, it had previously been raining, but at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.