Murphy Logging Co. v. United States

Good Law
378 F.2d 222·19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1623·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 196720281California1,437 words

Opinion

Opinion

378 F.2d 222 67-1 USTC P 9461 MURPHY LOGGING CO., successor by merger to Murphy Timber Co., Harry C. Murphy and Dorothy Shea Murphy, Edward J. Murphy and Virginia C. Murphy, Peter C. Murphy and Dorothy Z. Murphy, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 20281. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 15, 1967. Charles P. Duffy, Joyle C. Dahl, Duffy, Stout & Georgeson, Portland, Or., for appellants. Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Richard J. Heiman, Gilbert Andrews, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, POPE and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge: 1 Harry, Edward and Peter Murphy know the logging business pretty well. But in their apparent quest for federal income tax savings, they have collided with the internal revenue service. 2 The Brothers Murphy have operated as loggers in the timber lands of Oregon for some time. Today considerable equipment is usually required in that sort of business. 3 Before the tax years in controversy, the Murphy brothers operated for a long time as a partnership. In 1958 they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.