United States v. Sergio Pantoja-Torres

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 201414-10202California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10202

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01519-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SERGIO ELOY PANTOJA-TORRES,

a.k.a. Sergio Eloy Pantoja,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2014**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Eloy Pantoja-Torres appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Pantoja-Torres’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.